Web Accessibility

More usable digital experiences for more people

We review and improve websites so important content and actions are easier to perceive, understand, navigate, and operate across different abilities and technologies.

Discuss Accessibility
Web Accessibility

Accessibility is part of product quality

A website can look complete while remaining difficult or impossible to use without a mouse, at high zoom, with a screen reader, or when motion and contrast create barriers. Accessibility work examines the structure, content, interaction, and feedback that users depend on.

We use WCAG practices as a reference and describe the work accurately. A specific conformance claim should only be made after the relevant scope has been evaluated under defined conditions.

What we may need from you

  • Priority pages and critical user flows
  • Access to the current implementation
  • Known user or compliance requirements
  • A defined review scope

What you receive

  • Documented findings by priority
  • Practical remediation guidance
  • Implementation support when included
  • A follow-up review for the agreed scope

What this service can include

The review can cover a complete website, selected templates, or a specific user journey.

01

Keyboard navigation

Check focus order, visible focus, operable controls, menus, dialogs, and skip links.

02

Semantic structure

Review landmarks, headings, labels, buttons, links, lists, and content relationships.

03

Forms and feedback

Improve instructions, validation, errors, status messages, and required-field communication.

04

Visual accessibility

Review contrast, text resizing, zoom behavior, touch targets, spacing, and information conveyed by color.

05

Screen-reader support

Check accessible names, reading order, dynamic updates, alternative text, and hidden content behavior.

06

Motion and responsive behavior

Respect reduced-motion preferences and ensure layouts remain usable across viewport sizes.

How accessibility work is carried out

Automated tools are useful, but they do not replace manual review.

01

Define the evaluation scope

Select representative pages, components, user journeys, browsers, and assistive technologies.

02

Combine automated and manual checks

Use tools for coverage and manual testing for interaction, meaning, and usability.

03

Explain each barrier

Document who may be affected, why the issue matters, and how it can be corrected.

04

Implement or support remediation

Fix agreed issues or provide code and design guidance to the responsible team.

05

Retest the changed scope

Verify that corrections work and have not introduced new barriers.

Accessibility principles used in the work

The objective is usable behavior, not only passing an automated scan.

01

Perceivable

Content and interface information can be identified in more than one way where needed.

02

Operable

Controls and journeys remain usable without depending on a specific input method.

03

Understandable

Labels, instructions, navigation, and feedback remain predictable and clear.

04

Robust

Semantic implementation supports current browsers and assistive technologies.